0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

³ú µ¿¸Æ·ù¼º ÁöÁÖ¸·ÇÏÃâÇ÷ ȯÀÚ°£È£ÀÇ Áú Æò°¡ µµ±¸ °³¹ß

Development of a Quality Evaluation Tool for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Homorrhage Patient Care

¼ºÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2003³â 15±Ç 4È£ p.628 ~ 638
KMID : 0367020030150040628
¹è¼ÒÇö ( Hae So-Hyun ) - ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø

½Å¼º·Ê ( Shin Sung-Rae ) - »ïÀ°´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develope a evaluation tool of the quality of nursing care for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients at Hunt & Hess Grade ¥°¡­¥².

Method: The data was gathered from April 15, 2002 to June 14, 2002. The tool proceeded in six steps according to Bloch¡¯s framework.

Result: The results of this study are as follows: 1) The quality evaluation tool for neurosurgery ICU consisted of 25 standards and 138 criteria. The quality evaluation tool for ward consisted of 27 standards and 144 criteria.; 2) The content validities of the tools for neurosurgery ICU and ward were 0.96 and 0.98, respectively.; 3) The Pearson coefficients for evaluating the interrated reliability of the tools for neurosurgery ICU and ward were r=0.9106 (p< 0.1 ) and r=0.8807 (p<0.1), respectively. 4) The ranges of corrected item-total correlations for evaluating the construct validity of the tools for neurosurgery ICU and ward were 0.0279¡­0.9354 and 0.017 4¡­0.9682, respectively.: And 5) The ranges of Cronbach¡¯s a reliabilities for evaluating the internal consistency reliability of the tools for neurosurgery ICU and ward were 0.6040-0.8554 and 0.6212-0.9584, respectively.

Conclusion: The tools developed in this study seem useful in evaluating the quality of nursing care for aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients at Hunt & Hess Grade ¥°¡­¥².
KeyWords
³ú µ¿¸Æ·ù¼º ÁöÁÖ¸·ÇÏÃâÇ÷ Áú Æò°¡ µµ±¸
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed